How to improve Squeak
Serge Stinckwich
Serge.Stinckwich at info.unicaen.fr
Tue Jul 13 16:01:38 UTC 2004
Alexander Lazarević wrote:
> Ned Konz schrieb:
>
>> We have been so conservative with reviewing individual items because
>> there are a number of people (too many, probably) using the
>> pre-release versions of Squeak for everyday work. As a result, we
>> don't want to break too much.
>>
>>
> I think more people would use the stable version of Squeak for every day
> work if it would receive a little maintenance in form of irregular
> updates. Certainly these should only include bug fixes that (ideally)
> don't have any negative influence on existing code, which was written
> based on the stable version.
>
>> Using a bug tracking system (no, we don't have to write our own!)
>> would give better tracking, threading, assignment of responsibility, etc.
>>
> We _definitely_ should have such a BTS. Why not just set up bugzilla,
> mantis or whatever to see how we could make it fit in the Squeak
> development process?
Maybe, we can try to use a bug tracking system with the 3.7 stable
version of Squeak when it is out. He could be a test if this kind of
tools works with Squeak without any interference with the unstable
Squeak dev process.
I might help to build a BTS if there is some interest.
-- oooo
Serge Stinckwich OOOOOOOO
Université de Caen>CNRS UMR 6072>GREYC>MAD OOESUGOO
http://purl.org/net/SergeStinckwich oooooo
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)] \ /
##
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|