How to improve Squeak

Serge Stinckwich Serge.Stinckwich at info.unicaen.fr
Tue Jul 13 16:01:38 UTC 2004


Alexander Lazarević wrote:
> Ned Konz schrieb:
> 
>> We have been so conservative with reviewing individual items because 
>> there are a number of people (too many, probably) using the 
>> pre-release versions of Squeak for everyday work. As a result, we 
>> don't want to break too much.
>>  
>>
> I think more people would use the stable version of Squeak for every day 
> work if it would receive a little maintenance in form of irregular 
> updates. Certainly these should only include bug fixes that (ideally) 
> don't have any negative influence on existing code, which was written 
> based on the stable version.
> 
>> Using a bug tracking system (no, we don't have to write our own!) 
>> would give better tracking, threading, assignment of responsibility, etc.
>>
> We _definitely_ should have such a BTS. Why not just set up bugzilla, 
> mantis or whatever to see how we could make it fit in the Squeak 
> development process?

Maybe, we can try to use a bug tracking system with the 3.7 stable 
version of Squeak when it is out. He could be a test if this kind of 
tools works with Squeak without any interference with the unstable 
Squeak dev process.

I might help to build a BTS if there is some interest.

--                                                         oooo
Serge Stinckwich                                         OOOOOOOO
Université de Caen>CNRS UMR 6072>GREYC>MAD               OOESUGOO
http://purl.org/net/SergeStinckwich                       oooooo
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]   \  /
                                                             ##




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list