This is interesting but is not quite the way I work.  Multiple releases
do sound useful; it's just that I wouldn't categorize them precisely as
you describe.  I would like to have:

	1. one stable release
	2. one unstable release
	3. both of the above for each version of Squeak that I support

Also, I don't understand why *all* old versions are supposed to be kept
around.  So long as the newest stable release is there, what is the
problem?  People who are that interested in my project should delve into
the configuration management system, e.g. SqueakSource+Monticello, and
get vastly more information than just the releases.


Lex