Before ideas for 3.8 let us do a postmortem analysis
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Mon Jul 19 17:47:48 UTC 2004
This mail will certainly generate a lot of reaction but let us go for
It is composed of two points:
- I think that even if 3.7 was good from a process point of view and
the changes that were included (initialize, SM,...), the end (the
beta/gamma) phase did not work that well. And we should learn from it.
- Second, in 3.7 we got the squeakland fixes back in the stream and
this is good because
we had an implicit fork. Let us face it. Now diego is dying under the
problems that he has to work
with small-land and thinking about forking. So I would like that the
takes the times to listen what he wants to say. Diego please let us
know your problem.
More information about the Squeak-dev