Trouble installing Chuck

stéphane ducasse ducasse at
Wed Jun 2 19:35:52 UTC 2004

hi goran

May be you scared a bit people with the scheme that you had in mind.
May be having a simple and incremental (on problems) approach could 
work. So we could get simple
but not scalable dependencies then later on cool debian like 


On 2 juin 04, at 10:20, goran.krampe at wrote:

> Hi people!
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?st=E9phane_ducasse?= <ducasse at> wrote:
>> On 2 juin 04, at 03:45, Avi Bryant wrote:
>>> So how long before someone breaks down and adds dependencies to SM,
>>> already?
>> Yes we dramatically needs them even dead simple ones.
>> Stef
> Just for the record - I have on multiple occasions asked for
> co-maintainers of SM. :)
> I am still in gather-all-fixes-mode for SM. As soon as I get through
> those I will start on deps. Really. But I simply must get these FIXes
> done first.
> And the beta period is also stealing a bit of my attention, especially
> since the group of harvesters currently aren't very active - or so it
> seems.
> I would want more people to turn the attention to BFAV and enter 
> "*FIX*"
> in the title field and then go through those. Stop messing with ENHs. 
> We
> are in beta guys and time is running out. :)
> regards, Göran

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list