On SqueakMap I created a new entry named "BinarySavingMC"
You can try it by looking at the class MCBinaryWriterTest

Actually, I do not have the gain expected. It is fast to load methds, and not really to create the classes. There should be something wrong, but I do not know why...

For instance #testCreatingVersionSavingLoading show gains with big method and few classes
Test 1 ==> Time to load 100 methods using ascii file: 23298
Test 1 ==> Time to load 100 methods using binary file: 7957

But #testCreatingVersionSavingLoading2 say that classes are really costly:
Test 2 ==> Time to load 3 methods using ascii file: 13705
Test 2 ==> Time to load 3 methods using binary file: 14803

Note that running the test should be performed without any monticello browser open. And the result of the bench are shown on the transcript.

Cheers,
Alexandre


On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 11:17:13AM -0500, Colin Putney wrote:
> 
> On Jun 8, 2004, at 7:14 AM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
> 
> >Hi Collin,
> >
> >I am currently working on a binary mechanism saving for Monticello.
> >I am about to release it.
> 
> Excellent. I look forward to seeing it.
> 
> Colin
> 

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~bergel
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.