Avi Bryant <avi at beta4.com> wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2004, at 12:19 AM, goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
> 
> > The only thing that pops up in my mind is that this should perhaps be
> > implemented using "resources" that we can "tag" using categories. The
> > idea with resources is that anyone can create a resource (owned by the
> > creating account, just like packages) and then attach it to a single
> > other SMObject (in this case an SMPackageRelease) not necessarily owned
> > by the resource owner.
> 
> That doesn't seem right.  This is definitely something that should be 
> under the control of the person making the release.  And these URLs 
> need to have very specific semantics that are honored by the loader, 
> they aren't just arbitrary extra metadata.  So I think we'd want to 
> just extend SMPackageRelease itself.

Mmmm. Ok. Agree. :)

> Avi

regards, Göran