Trygve Reenskaug <trygver at ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> Goran,
> Hey, you got a point here. Perhaps we could try to introduce a few standard 
> conventions in our *standard packages*."?! And then we can take the 
> discussion from there!
> 
> We need to get innovations out quickly, even if they are dirty. (I really 
> need the stuff I'm using right now. It would have been nice if it had been 
> more complete. But this is much better than not having it at all.
> 
> But a package shouldn't be upgraded to a *standard package* before it 
> fulfills a few quality requirements - and that includes a minimum of 
> comments and/or documentation.

Thank you, thank you, thank you. :) At least I am not alone.

regards, Göran