I not only think that it's not only not pointless to try, but that 
it's necessary to succeed.  And I can't see why any package  that 
will be included in the base can't conform to the standards.

>goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
>
>Ok, so in short you think it is pointless to even *try*? And how would
>we ever be able to evolve Squeak with say Traits if we can't even agree
>on some simple, small coding conventions *in the standard packages*?
>
>Again - please people, come on! Can't at least some of you say "Hey, you
>got a point here. Perhaps we could try to introduce a few standard
>conventions in our *standard packages*."?! And then we can take the
>discussion from there.
>
>If not - then it truly disappoints me, I really thought this community
>was... capable of constructive cooperation instead of petty "No, I don't
>like this or that!" or "Forget it, no point..."
>
>regards, G–ran


-- 
		----------------------------------------------------
Source code in files. How quaint. -- Kent Beck