Yes, I didn't examine the error closely enough.  I suspect you are
correct.  I also agree that loading BFAV2 in anything but the latest
image would be unusual at best.

Ken

On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 13:24, Doug Way wrote:
> Also, it could be that he's trying to use BFAV with 3.6 and not 
> 3.7alpha?  I'm guessing the latest BFAV won't work with 3.6, although I 
> could be wrong.  (And it looks like the BFAV2 packages are listed as 
> only working with 3.7, so no one should really expect it to work with 
> 3.6.)
> 
> Actually, there's not really much point in opening BFAV in 3.6... the 
> whole point of BFAV is for tracking/fixing bugs in the latest alpha, 
> right?
> 
> - Doug

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20040309/30b3e39f/attachment.pgp