Steven Swerling wrote:

>> to prevent them.  As for the s-t vs T...this is a platform dependent 
>> issue which I am very interested in straightening out (some platforms 
>> don't list shift as a qualifier they just give the capital keycode, 
>> others include the shift qualifier and give a lowercase keycode).  
>> What platform are you using?
>
>
> Hi David,
>
> How's about we turn all shift-modified alphabetical chars to capital 
> letters for the #match method? So that 's-t' -> 'T',  'ms-t' -> 'm-T', 
> and 'cs-t' goes to 'c-T'. Although it won't solve *all* of the 
> platform-specific issues, at least we will get alphabetical chars in 
> the bag. I know we've discussed this issue a bit already, but this 
> case in particular seems like low hanging fruit for the picking.
>
> Regards,
> Steve S.
>
>
>
Agreed, I think there are a few other obvious non-alpha ones I can 
handle as well.  Also, this points to a flaw in my conversion of the 
ParagraphEditor keymappings which I will fix ASAP.

David

-- 
C. David Shaffer
http://www.cs.westminster.edu/~shaffer
http://www.shaffer-consulting.com