> One thing that is very(!!!) important, and IMHO _greatly_ 
> under appreciated by the Squeak community (sorry gang, just 
> calling it how I see it) is the FEEL of the user interface.  
> My experience is that users don't know widgets/controls/etc. 
> when they see them.  They see "screens", and they don't much 
> care how things look, as long as they are: (1) not ugly; (2) 
> somewhat intuitive; (3) responsive.
> 

Great post, Bill. One recent example of UI "feel" improvement in Squeak,
IMO, is Ken Causey's tabs work (currently only incorporated in the
BFAV2).