>
> Agreed.  While I'd guess that we will probably never move the core
> development environment of Squeak to relying on native widgets (this
> goes against the basic philosophy of Squeak), there's no reason that we
> can't have support for developing standalone applications that use
> native widgets, if a developer wants to do that.
>

May be, but I feel that the Smalltalk way is "all in the image", then would
be nice to have evolutions of Morphic to manage things as another widgets.

gsa.