[Q] initialization pattern
stéphane ducasse
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Sun May 16 17:20:11 UTC 2004
This is interesting that you found that
>> Seems to me a mistake because new: should call also initialize or may
>> be initialize:
>
> That is quite possible, I found that on 2003-09-09
> you posted a change set that contained (among
> other things) this definition:
>
> Behavior methodsFor: 'instance creation'
> new: sizeRequested
> "Answer an initialized instance of this class with the number of
> indexable
> variables specified by the argument, sizeRequested."
>
> ^ (self basicNew: sizeRequested) initialize
>
> I still could not find out why this got lost. I will try to
> find out but perhaps a KCP fellow has a quick
> answer?
>
> Greetings, Boris
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|