On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 03:26:14PM -0700, Tim Rowledge wrote:
> 
> Don't suppose you've spotted why Exception>outer is broken, seeing that
> you're on a roll?

I don't even know what Exception>>outer would do if it *wasn't* broken,
but I see there are some test cases for it, so it must be something
worth caring about. Maybe I'll have a look at it just in case it turns
out that I actually am on a roll. Or I just could buy a lottery ticket ;)

Dave