for the OldSocket please send your cs that remove them from the image.
Or publish a sm package that remove it from the image.

I would prefer to deprecate it simply. Is there anybody there that need 
it?

Stef

> Marcus Denker napsal(a):
>> Am 01.11.2004 um 04:22 schrieb Yanni Chiu:
> >
>>> "Squeak" is too big. It needs to shrink, to grow.
>
> I feel good someone thinks the same as me. Now, can we refer to this 
> as "clean-up" effort? If so, do we stick with something "cleaners" can 
> rely on? I found "Cleanup/Enhancement Projects" 
> <http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3082> but I remember there was 
> maybe better information but didn't find it now (wiki has no tree).
>
>> submit changesets.
>
> I did some clean-up for getting rid of OldSocket. I was then adviced 
> to make a backup as a SqueakMap package. Is it right place for 
> backups? Or should it be published as *-Removal package? Sorry to 
> "talk" again, but there are questions I don't even know whom to ask. 
> There's SpeechRemoval package, so what to do now in order to have 
> Speech as installable package and not like traveling with every new 
> image being released?
>
>> Harvesting ist not about "we need to do X". It's just about
>> "Someone has already done Y, let's get it in the release".
>
> I have read somewhere "Process of completion is about subtraction, not 
> addition". I just think refactoring oriented to completness (like this 
> complies with RFC XXXX) brings Squeak its power to stay alive and 
> well.
>
> -- 
> Kamil
>