TestRunner in 3.8 -- ARGH!!!

stéphane ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Nov 2 20:30:09 UTC 2004


> Personally I use the TestBrowser goodie which is really a nice
> way to run and implement tests. It was created by Kazuki Minamitani-san
> and I refactored it a little bit (the code is already
> integrated).
>
> See:
> http://map1.squeakfoundation.org/sm/package/6dfad36f-afd0-40ec-b4aa- 
> cd59445c4246
> and
> http://kminami.fc2web.com/Squeak/Goodies/TestBrowser/index.html
>
> If you have used it for a while I'm sure you will like it
> and throw the simple TestRunner away. I use it in Sq3.6 up to Sq3.8
> images and it's rock solid !!! It's nice since you can run tests
> by category, by class or run single test methods. Especially when
> you use Monticello and special class categories for tests this is
> a really helpfull and clearly arranged tool.
>
> I would vote for replacing the simple TestRunner with the TestBrowser
> in the standard image and provide the old TestRunner as an
> optional package. Later me want to convert it to use OmniBrowser
> as it's base architecture.

Have you checked the conflicts with 3.8? Where is your refactored  
version?
Because indeed this could be a good candidate to replace this simple  
SUnit TestRunner.

Stef




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list