[ANN] Cleaned up KomHttpServer on SM
Stephen Pair
stephen at pairhome.net
Fri Nov 5 03:00:18 UTC 2004
stéphane ducasse wrote:
>> This is great...it's good to see someone picking up active
>> development on Comanche again. As you might have guessed, I haven't
>> had a lot of spare time in the last couple years to devote to Squeak
>> or Comanche (kids and work tend to chew up bucket loads of time). I
>> also haven't been able to stay on top of the list from day to day.
>> I'm now using VisualWorks in my day job, so I have some amount of
>> interest in porting Comanche (or at least parts of it) to VW...so I
>> might have some input/improvements to offer down the road.
>
>
> Hi stephen
>
> I always thought that swazoo was better than comanche. Can you comment
> on why you
> would like to port comanche on VW?
>
> Stef
>
I don't know Swazoo well enough to do a fair comparison. I know I like
the service management framework, the logging infrastructure and the
module framework in Comanche. All of those things really have nothing
to do with HTTP itself. Swazoo probably does have a better model of
HTTP messages and certainly more features. I think both could use a
complete re-write of the HTTP message model (sticking very close to the
RFC). It might be worth combining the best aspects of both.
- Stephen
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|