As my last experience shows me, I'm not sure it's a good idea to blindly 
upgrade or load something in a Squeak image.  I have the feeling I'm in a 
mines field :-)

Joseph

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <goran.krampe at bluefish.se>
To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list" 
<squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [BUG]bug when trying to send a bug report with celeste inSqueak 
3.7


> Hi!
>
> "Doug Way" <dway at mailcan.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 10:39:49 +0100, "Marcus Denker" <denker at iam.unibe.ch>
>> said:
>> >
>> > Am 09.11.2004 um 10:21 schrieb Joseph Frippiat:
>> >
>> > > OK, corrected : with the package loader I updraded Celeste to 1.24 
>> > > and
>> > > now
>> > > it works better.  The other bug with the new database creation error
>> > > is also
>> > > corrected with this upgrade.
>> > >
>> > > Sorry, I didn't know.  But this means that it will be quite difficult
>> > > to
>> > > write an industrial application with Squeak: Squeak 3.7 is not so
>> > > stable...
>>
>> The situation is not quite as bad as it sounds... these are not bugs in
>> Squeak 3.7, they are bugs in Celeste.  Celeste is part of the Full
>> Squeak configuration, but it's not part of the slimmed-down Basic
>> configuration, which is likely what you would build your industrial
>> application on.  (Unless your app requires Celeste for some reason.)
>
> Yes, and as a sidenote - when I fire up a clean image to start some work
> I always bring up the SqueakMap Package Loader first and select "upgade
> all installed packages". :)
>
> regards, Göran
>
>