BFAV and Mantis Statistics
Doug Way
dway at mailcan.com
Mon Nov 15 18:23:53 UTC 2004
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:45:38 +0100, "Marcus Denker"
<denker at iam.unibe.ch> said:
> ...
> BFAV contains lots of old stuff, I think we should do, as a first step:
>
> -> close all submissions that did not have any review newer than 6
> Month.
> If a fix/enh is not touched for half a year, it's clear that it is
> not important.
>
> -> close all submissions that have problems (e.g. conflicts with newer
> changes) in the
> following case: Someone reviewed, found the problem and sent a
> comment
> (e.g. "conflicts", "needs changeset"). Now there is no reaction
> of the author for 3 months.
> These should be closed, as the change is not even important for
> the author.
>
> -> close bug-reports older then 1 year, ask the author to re-check
> with newest version and
> re-report in mantis if needed.
Sounds like a reasonable plan.
Also, adding a new BFAV (or Mantis) category for representing "needs
work" (as discussed in the other thread) sounds like a good idea to me
too. It's similar to the "Review" status, but is more specific.
- Doug
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|