Am 19.11.2004 um 00:05 schrieb Blake:

> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:49:13 -0800, Brian Rice <water at tunes.org> wrote:
>
>> Oops. I didn't answer this one question well-enough:
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2004, at 2:37 PM, Brian Rice wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 18, 2004, at 2:17 PM, stéphane ducasse wrote:
>>>> Do you take advantage of traits in your library?
>>
>> I already stated that we had multiple inheritance, but it is not at 
>> the level of the SCG work simply because we couldn't do it. The 
>> transition to SCG-style semantics is new (so new it's not in a 
>> numbered release yet), and so the library refactoring and full 
>> requires/provides annotations have not been completed. We will likely 
>> borrow ideas from the SCG's published code just to speed up the 
>> process, although it will not likely turn out the same for many 
>> reasons.
>
> I'm sorry: What is SCG? (I can normally decode the acronyms and 
> abbreviations here with a Google search but not this one.)

Software Composition Group: http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~scg/

     Marcus