"Andreas Raab" <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> > Aren't you the one who keeps saying that Smalltalk doesn't have variables, 
> > just names that refer to objects? :-)
> 
> Err, no. I'm the guy who says fix the language! :-)
> 
> Heh, heh.

So given that - how do we fix it? Introduce a new way to refer to
"globals", some kind of "binding" object?
 
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas

regards, Göran