Some thoughts 2/3: Preparing 3.9
stéphane ducasse
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Sep 14 14:24:37 UTC 2004
I mean "as getting of the old browsers in the long run" if possible too.
Stef
On 12 sept. 04, at 20:49, goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?st=E9phane_ducasse?= <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> for 3.9 we (marcus and me at least) would like to see the following
>> tools integrated into the image:
>> - RB engine
>> - services
>> - shout
>> - OmniBrowser
>>
>> Now what is important is to identify the changes that are done over
>> 3.7
>> basic and minimise then by:
>> - checking if they are really worth
>> - analysing the extensions or patches and introducing them separately
>> into the basic image.
>> If there are missing hooks then they should be separated and
>> harvested
>> into the basic image
>> so that other tools can use them.
>>
>> So what I would like to know if the interested parties are ok with
>> this
>> plan?
>
> I assume you mean "integrated as packages", right? In that case I am
> all
> with you. :)
>
> regards, Göran
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|