Some thoughts 2/3: Preparing 3.9

stéphane ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Sep 14 14:24:37 UTC 2004


I mean "as getting of the old browsers in the long run" if possible too.

Stef


On 12 sept. 04, at 20:49, goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:

> Hi all!
>
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?st=E9phane_ducasse?= <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> for 3.9 we (marcus and me at least) would like to see the following
>> tools integrated into the image:
>> 	- RB engine
>> 	- services
>> 	- shout
>> 	- OmniBrowser
>>
>> Now what is important is to identify the changes that are done over 
>> 3.7
>> basic and minimise then by:
>> 	- checking if they are really worth
>> 	- analysing the extensions or patches and introducing them separately
>> into the basic image.
>> 	If there are missing hooks then they should be separated and 
>> harvested
>> into the basic image
>> 	so that other tools can use them.
>>
>> So what I would like to know if the interested parties are ok with 
>> this
>> plan?
>
> I assume you mean "integrated as packages", right? In that case I am 
> all
> with you. :)
>
> regards, Göran
>




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list