[ENH] ifNotEmptyCleans

Brent Pinkney brent.pinkney at aircom.co.za
Thu Sep 30 11:03:47 UTC 2004


> For me I do not understand what it means to require an argument, in this  
> case this is not
> 	ifNotEmpty: [do that]
> 	but ifNotEmpty: [do that with self]
> and the message does not tell that at all
>
> and why we have that for ifNotEmpty and not for ifTrue: and isNil:
>
> Really I do not understand and as a user of the interface I do not get  
> that at all.
>
> But not like that. Sorry this is really bad

Yip - this is bad, Stef's refactoring are good. Better to have clean  
CONSISTENT interface.

brent



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list