Database options was (Re: My first Magma experience ...)
Todd Blanchard
tblanchard at mac.com
Sun Apr 3 06:21:22 UTC 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I'm using postgres 8 - it works fine. I don't think the client
interface has changed at all.
On Apr 2, 2005, at 9:41 PM, Jimmie Houchin wrote:
> It seems that for productions sites with larger database needs that
> Relational databases are currently preferred. At least this is how I
> interpret what I've read. Please feel free to correct.
>
> The primary options of those it seems are PostgreSQL 7 and MySQL 4.
>
> I have considered learning PostgreSQL but 8 is the current version and
> from my understanding is not currently supported.
>
> I also think that SQLite 3 looks interesting and much more along the
> lines for comparison with Magma and GOODS. It is small, embeddable,
> and to my understanding performs very well.
>
> I would think that with a quality driver for SQLite3 that we could
> write a good OO frontend to storing objects in SQLite3. And/or provide
> people with the option to access SQLite3 at its normal relational
> level or via OO.
>
> Am I off base or mistaken? Am I alone? Anybody else interested in
> SQLite?
>
> What kind of effort would a driver/plugin for SQLite3 take?
>
> But what kind of bounty would someone take to be motivated to write
> such?
>
> Ideas, opinions?
> Just exploring my options.
>
> Jimmie
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCT4thhullemWJdQ8RAtryAJ4tv0hZtQ2nWack90Txz2XU9fqI+ACgwKrV
RMgZgcK1kvLrn0tMjx7Mkys=
=my7o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|