(Hopefully) final version of string refactoring
Yoshiki Ohshima
yoshiki at squeakland.org
Wed Apr 13 12:50:49 UTC 2005
Andreas,
> Which confusion?
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/stddef.h.html:
>
> wchar_t
> Integer type whose range of values can represent distinct
> wide-character codes for all members of the largest character set
> specified among the locales supported by the compilation environment:
> the null character has the code value 0 and each member of the portable
> character set has a code value equal to its value when used as the lone
> character in an integer character constant.
>
> There is really nothing confusing about it.
Hmm, quoting the standard doesn't mean it is fine. (Should I have
written "vague" or "platform-dependent"?)
But, I stop wasting people's time. WideString is ok with me.
-- Yoshiki
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|