Hi ken

I found myfself recently regretting the old BFAV time, because I got 
trapped within the
bad interface of mantis losing a lot of time there. So I stopped using 
it because I could not.
I did not say anything because I did not want to put the mess.
Now I have a question: is there someone working on producing something 
better than
mantis/ or patching mantis because what I see is that it slows us down 
a lot.

Stef


On 21 avr. 05, at 18:27, Ken Causey wrote:

> Primarily because we janitors are human and the BFAV database serves 
> for
> now as a useful backup to help us keep track of what issues we have and
> have not properly handled.  If we miss one then it is very easy to 
> catch
> by looking in BFAV.  Secondarily, there are still issues in BFAV that
> should be handled in the old way.  To do that harvesters need to be 
> able
> to close the issue, mark them as approved, mark them as being in an
> update etc.  All this relies on BFAV being able to receive new reports
> by email.
>
> However there may come a time in the not too distant future when I can
> shut down the monitoring of the squeak-dev list and just monitor the
> behind the scenes squeak-harvesting list.  However I don't think we are
> quite ready for that yet.
>
> Ken
>
> On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 12:52 -0300, Hernan Tylim wrote:
>> Hi Ken,
>>
>> I've seen a lot of this mails, and I am not criticizing, but I always
>> wondered.... Why don't you just shutdown the BFAV server? or at least
>> the part of it that scan and parse the mailing list ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Hernán
>>
>
>