That would be fine. I guess it would be fair to maintain the full  
package with stable releases instead of beta releases. Is there a  
standard process defined for beta/stable releases?

- Daniel

On Aug 24, 2005, at 7:49 AM, Bruce O'Neel wrote:

> Hi,
>
> For now you can download the full package and then download the new VM
> version.
>
> This does bring up a good point for (mostly) the Mac folks.  Would you
> like that I keep the full package up to date with John's latest VM?
> Or should it not change so often?
>
> The Win VM seems fairly static so this isn't an issue for them.  I
> could also keep updating the Unixy packages as well.
>
> My temptation is to only update the full packages when there is a non
> beta release of some VM and/or when the existing vm is shown to have
> some gross problem.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> cheers
>
> bruce
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:48:51PM -0400, Daniel Salama wrote:
>
>> Just wondering where can I get the latest 3.8 full version of Squeak
>> for Mac OS. I went to squeak.org, but then I saw John McIntosh's post
>> about the newer VM. Should I download the full version from
>> squeak.org and then use John's VM?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> edoneel at sdf.lonestar.org
> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
>
>