Hi Juan,

many people seem to think Tweak is the new Etoys. Why? All I can see 
indicates that it is the new Morphic. So, putting my question again in 
other words ;)

Why is Tweak not "morphic" ? I mean if there is a specific quality 
Morphic has that Tweak hasn't, perhaps it would be useful to make the 
Tweak team aware of it in time.

Other than that your effort is of course important for the many existing 
Squeak programs, that want to be used without consuming porting energies.

regards,
Martin


> Hi Martin,
> 
>> ...
>> And when all Morphic users switch to Tweak or wxSqueak, just leave 
>> Morphic behind. Or is there any specific reason to stay with Morphic?
> 
> 
> Personally, I like Morphic and I'm not sure Tweak will replace it, at 
> least for my needs. It's a matter of personal preference. The whole 
> ToolBuilder idea is to be able to choose between different graphic 
> frameworks, for example Tweak, Morphic and perhaps (not sure) MVC.
> 
>> To put it differently, why do you seem to think only Etoys users will 
>> switch to Tweak,
> 
> 
> As I understand it, the objective of Tweak is to replace Etoys.
> 
>> or why should one who wants a 'morphic' UI not switch to Tweak? You 
>> answered the question yourself. Simply because Tweak is not 'morphic'.
> 
> 
>> regards,
>> Martin
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Juan Vuletich
>