Traits approaching mainstream Squeak

Blake blake at kingdomrpg.com
Wed Aug 31 20:26:45 UTC 2005


On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:39:36 -0700, Chris Muller <afunkyobject at yahoo.com>  
wrote:

>> Is any of this seriously debated? I mean, traits notwithstanding, has
>> anyone who has ever built a large hierarchy of objects NOT run into the
>> above problems?
>
> Traits are not required to avoid bloat or duplication that comes with
> inheritance, just use composition.  Granted, it requires explicit  
> delegation
> (or a DNU hack) but, many times, only a small portion of the behavior of  
> the
> provided by the Collection (or whatever) is needed.  This, in fact, can  
> help
> understand a system better because the only "inherited" behavior is  
> explicitly
> declared by the fowarding messages.

As a longtime Delphi user, I'm quite aware of the value (and shortcomings)  
of delegation.

> I'm not at all opposed to Traits in the image, especially if it is not
> disruptive to function or performance.  I'm sure I'll even find a good  
> use for
> it some day..

I think it's amazing what they've done as far as making it non-disruptive.  
(And I'm intrigued by the question of "is inheritance necessary".)



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list