What does Squeak application development look like?
Brad Fuller
brad at sonaural.com
Fri Dec 9 23:15:01 UTC 2005
Brad Fuller wrote:
> On 11:03 AM ducasse wrote:
>
>> > Squeak has Monticello for this, I can live without it as I'm
>> > developing alone. From the list I get the impression that it doesn't
>> > scale well, the people preparing the next image seem to have serious
>> > performance problems.
>>
>>
>> Even for my one person project I cannot live without MC. And it is
>
> scaling well (even if has some speed problems and missing atomic load)
> but managing Squeak with MC is not a simple project, but we are making
> it real :)
>
> I agree. Monticello is a great tool even for one person
How does one use Monticello for gathering arbitrary classes into a
single Package? Can you do that?
brad
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|