What does Squeak application development look like?

Brad Fuller brad at sonaural.com
Fri Dec 9 23:15:01 UTC 2005


Brad Fuller wrote:

> On 11:03 AM ducasse wrote:
>
>>  > Squeak has Monticello for this, I can live without it as I'm
>>  > developing alone. From the list I get the impression that it doesn't
>>  > scale well, the people preparing the next image seem to have serious
>>  > performance problems.
>>
>>
>>  Even for my one person project I cannot live without MC. And it is 
>
> scaling well (even if has some speed problems and missing atomic load) 
> but managing Squeak with MC is not a simple project, but we are making 
> it real :)
>
> I agree. Monticello is a great tool even for one person

How does one use Monticello for gathering arbitrary classes into a 
single Package? Can you do that?
brad



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list