> Oh, it's maybe better than Envy from a conceptual standpoint, but the 
> implementation is such a mess that if you want to change StORE a bit 
> in order to have it support your processes better, you will quickly 
> support my conclusion :)
>
> (and don't try to deliver any criticism to the StORE lead - she'll 
> bite your head off...)

totally true this implementation is extremely bad mixing layers, 
proposing three times the same methods with different names....

Anyway the model for developing seems better than envy. Jon did you got 
problem with the merge?
Because it took 45 min to merge 5 changes. Which back end have you been 
using?

Stef