Modules
Alexandre Bergel
bergel at iam.unibe.ch
Sat Feb 26 08:27:12 UTC 2005
> partitioning for development and partitioning for deployment. It's good
> that we make that distinction, particularly at the beginning since we
> now have lots of stuff that isn't separately deployable, but should be.
Right.
> There's no need to preserve the class categories as they stand today...
Exactly. Let's get rid of class categories. However, it might be difficult to assure backward compatibility. This is on what I was working with the packages as first-class entities...
> Of course, that kind of partitioning may prove difficult, but it will
> probably pay off in the end.
Whatever the strategy of partitioning, we should need tools to do it :-)
I am currently working on a new package browser that would perform this step easily...
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~bergel
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|