Reappropriating Squeak Dev :)

Cees De Groot cdegroot at gmail.com
Fri Jul 22 11:44:45 UTC 2005


On 7/22/05, Gary Fisher <gafisher at sprynet.com> wrote:
> I agree, Stef.  Part of the charm of the old Squeak-Dev list was the cross-pollination it encouraged.  Multiple lists are fine for organizing production but murderous to innovation.  There may be a benefit in identifying broad topics via subject [tags] but dividing them out has the feel of brainstorming by telegraph.
> 
The original idea was, I think, to have the brainstorming here and
then the detailed working out, day-to-day project management, etcetera
on the individual lists. If it was not the original idea, I think it
is how it should work ;P



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list