about 3.9alpha

stéphane ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Fri Jun 10 06:21:05 UTC 2005


thanks for the report.
I will look at that.
There are some funny things because I got a lot of updates skipped  
one day and I do not know why.



> Hi Stef,
>
> OK, sorry I misunderstood I thought you ment help testing the  
> update from 3.8
> to 3.9 in your previous email.
>
> I have tried the update before I realized it, because I wanted to  
> try latest
> 3.9alpha, so FWIW, here's what hapened
>
> I did:
>     - download 3.8 Full from http://box1.squeakfoundation.org/files/ 
> 3.8/
>         - ran the 3.8 Full image under squeak version =
>             3.8a-1 #1 Tue Mar 22 14:09:10 PST 2005 ccache
>         Squeak3.8gamma of '24 November 2004' [latest update: #6548]
>     - Squeak asked "Do you want to check for updates" - answered  
> Yes Update ->
> Squeak Public Updates, 0 updates
>         - executed in workspace: SystemVersion  
> newVersion:'Squeak3.9alpha'
>         - saved image as Squeak3.9alpha.image
>         - restarted squeak with Squeak3.9alpha.image
>     - Squeak asked "Do you want to check for updates" - answered  
> Yes Update ->
> Squeak Public Updates. When loading:
>             Error1: Loading 6537, Server Name Not Found and other  
> errors, finally
> abandod.
>         Restarted update, 9 more updates after tat, no more errors
>         - saved
>         - did a few very simple things with Projects, Morphs etc
>         - simple stuff looks good
>
> Then I wanted to use it as webserver instead of 3.7 I use now, so I:
>     - OPened SqueakMap PackageLoader
>             - When Loading it: error occured when updating map:
> UndefinedObject>>allInstances. Proceeded, but keeps repeating, finally
> abandoned it
>
> So I was unable to open PackageLoader ... Perhaps a known problem  
> anyway (I
> don't need to fix it in any way, just thought I'd report it as I've  
> already
> kept the log)
>
> milan
>
> On June 9, 2005 04:34 pm, stéphane ducasse wrote:
>
>
>> Hi milan
>>
>>
>>
>>> Stef, Does it help to just test the upgrade from 3.8 final to
>>> 3.9alpha, and is
>>> it more valuable to test from full or basic or both?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I think that for now we should really work more on putting in place
>> mechanisms to
>> support 3.9 (use of MC) so testing may be of limited use.
>> But if you do it please let us know if you get problems
>> Stef
>>
>>
>>
>>> There seem many places pointing to 3.7 as "latest", I assume a good
>>> link to
>>> 3.8 is
>>>
>>> http://box1.squeakfoundation.org/files/3.8/
>>>
>>> Thanks Milan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list