True.
I will check for Moose the exact convention we use because  
identifying the tests precisely with the version
they cover will become important (I learned that).



On 11 juin 05, at 10:19, Andreas Raab wrote:

> I disagree. There is absolutely no problem with tests in separate  
> packages. And it allows one to bootstrap a system without circular  
> dependencies.
>
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
>
> stéphane ducasse wrote:
>
>> yes this sounds the best solution
>> Stef
>> On 10 juin 05, at 22:22, Simon Michael wrote:
>>
>>> It seems simpler for most packages to come with tests included,  
>>> IMHO.
>>>
>
>