Hello Milan,

I do not know if someone changed the configuration of the stream, but I did an update from the Squeak Public Server using a 3.8-6548 and several changes got loaded without any error.

Cheers,
Alexandre

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:11:11AM -0400, Milan Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi Stef,
> 
> OK, sorry I misunderstood I thought you ment help testing the update from 3.8 
> to 3.9 in your previous email.
> 
> I have tried the update before I realized it, because I wanted to try latest 
> 3.9alpha, so FWIW, here's what hapened 
> 
> I did:
> 	- download 3.8 Full from http://box1.squeakfoundation.org/files/3.8/
>         - ran the 3.8 Full image under squeak version =
>         	3.8a-1 #1 Tue Mar 22 14:09:10 PST 2005 ccache
> 		Squeak3.8gamma of '24 November 2004' [latest update: #6548]
> 	- Squeak asked "Do you want to check for updates" - answered Yes Update -> 
> Squeak Public Updates, 0 updates
>         - executed in workspace: SystemVersion newVersion:'Squeak3.9alpha'
>         - saved image as Squeak3.9alpha.image
>         - restarted squeak with Squeak3.9alpha.image
> 	- Squeak asked "Do you want to check for updates" - answered Yes Update -> 
> Squeak Public Updates. When loading:
>         	Error1: Loading 6537, Server Name Not Found and other errors, finally 
> abandod.
> 		Restarted update, 9 more updates after tat, no more errors
>         - saved
>         - did a few very simple things with Projects, Morphs etc
>         - simple stuff looks good
> 
> Then I wanted to use it as webserver instead of 3.7 I use now, so I:
> 	- OPened SqueakMap PackageLoader
>         	- When Loading it: error occured when updating map: 
> UndefinedObject>>allInstances. Proceeded, but keeps repeating, finally 
> abandoned it
> 
> So I was unable to open PackageLoader ... Perhaps a known problem anyway (I 
> don't need to fix it in any way, just thought I'd report it as I've already 
> kept the log)
> 
> milan
> 
> On June 9, 2005 04:34 pm, stéphane ducasse wrote:
> > Hi milan
> >
> > > Stef, Does it help to just test the upgrade from 3.8 final to
> > > 3.9alpha, and is
> > > it more valuable to test from full or basic or both?
> >
> > I think that for now we should really work more on putting in place
> > mechanisms to
> > support 3.9 (use of MC) so testing may be of limited use.
> > But if you do it please let us know if you get problems
> > Stef
> >
> > > There seem many places pointing to 3.7 as "latest", I assume a good
> > > link to
> > > 3.8 is
> > >
> > > http://box1.squeakfoundation.org/files/3.8/
> > >
> > > Thanks Milan
> > >
> > >> Stef
> 

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~bergel  
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.