Hi john

This is a cool look. I like the changes of jason :). I think that if  
we want to change the out of the box
look of squeak your changes should be push in the image since there  
are a lot of overrides and
this is important that there is not too much difference between basic  
and full images.
We discussed with marcus about that because I wanted to have it in  
3.8 final....but for the reasons above we did not make it.

Stef



> Ben Schroeder and myself (John Pierce) maintain this look. While we  
> are kind of picky about the look and want a clean presentation, we  
> will look at suggestions and incorporate as appropriate.
>
> Regards,
>
> John
>
> On 6/18/05, Jason Rogers <jacaetevha at fast-mail.org> wrote: Stéphane  
> Ducasse wrote:
>
> > - (2) load the LookEnhancement available at
> > MCHttpRepository
> > location: 'http://squeak.saltypickle.com/LookEnhancements '
> > user: ''
> > password: ''
>
> I really like this. Who is maintaining this? I have one suggestion.  
> The
> inactive window's color looks really blocky when it loses its gradient
> look. Why not keep the gradient look and just wash the window out  
> some?
> Or the active window could have a darker or bolder border.
>
> --
> Jason Rogers
>
> "I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I,
> but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in
> the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved
> me, and gave himself for me."
>     Galatians 2:20
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> It's easy to have a complicated idea. It's very very hard to have a  
> simple idea. -- Carver Mead
>
>
>