scamper problem
goran.krampe at bluefish.se
goran.krampe at bluefish.se
Thu Mar 3 15:41:20 UTC 2005
Hi!
Michael Rueger <michael at impara.de> wrote:
> goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
>
> > You may omit <host> implying "localhost" (thus getting 3 slashes in a
> > row), but that is it. The path is always absolute according to the
> > standard, but in Squeak you can still tell the URL if it should be
>
> for the gazilionst time:
> relative URIs/URLs are allowed by the standard
> (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2396.html).
Eh, hmmm, this feels like deja vu. :) Ah, it is:
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2004-April/07778
8.html
> They just have to be resolved against an absolute URI in order to access
> the resource identified/located by it.
>
> And the URLs in Squeak are still broken and should be replaced by one of
> the existing standard compliant URI implementations.
>
> OK, stepping of my soap box with the broken record sounding...
I still am confused at what to think. See the posting above. It does not
seem clear cut at all.
> Michael
regards, Göran
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|