Am 08.03.2005 um 01:33 schrieb Thomas Koenig:

> At what point did the 3.8 vs 3.9 version of RB diverge?  I'm interested
> in working with RB in 3.9a.  But if 3.9 RB is a real mess I maybe 
> should
> just work in 3.8 for a while.
>
>

I moved the RB AST and Visitor framework into the compiler package.
So "RB for 3.9" is just the same, but without the RB-AST.

I originally had added the AST to the image (as part of the in-image
compiler package). But this was then removed when the unstable
updates where filterered for a quick 3.8 release, requirering now
the special package.

RB for 3.9 is not specific for 3.9, it's the one to install if the new 
compiler
is installed.

I have not yet come around to make a new 3.9 package, I need to
do that. But it seems that monticello can't make an easy merge between
the "RB3.9+Compiler" and Ned's. So I need to look at that.

      Marcus