Thanks.  I'll be playing with RB in 3.9, so if there's something I could
work on (best way to learn) let me know

> -----Original Message-----
> From: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On 
> Behalf Of Marcus Denker
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 8:19 AM
> To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
> Subject: Re: [ANN] Refactoring Browser v3838 updates
> 
> 
> 
> Am 08.03.2005 um 01:33 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
> 
> > At what point did the 3.8 vs 3.9 version of RB diverge?  I'm 
> > interested in working with RB in 3.9a.  But if 3.9 RB is a 
> real mess I 
> > maybe should just work in 3.8 for a while.
> >
> >
> 
> I moved the RB AST and Visitor framework into the compiler 
> package. So "RB for 3.9" is just the same, but without the RB-AST.
> 
> I originally had added the AST to the image (as part of the 
> in-image compiler package). But this was then removed when 
> the unstable updates where filterered for a quick 3.8 
> release, requirering now the special package.
> 
> RB for 3.9 is not specific for 3.9, it's the one to install 
> if the new 
> compiler
> is installed.
> 
> I have not yet come around to make a new 3.9 package, I need 
> to do that. But it seems that monticello can't make an easy 
> merge between the "RB3.9+Compiler" and Ned's. So I need to 
> look at that.
> 
>       Marcus
> 
>