Random and unsolicited feedback on 3.9a
Andreas Raab
andreas.raab at gmx.de
Sat Nov 19 00:39:28 UTC 2005
Can we please consider the consequences of doing that (like potentially
breaking lots of code from fileIns) and how we are going to deal with it
*before* such a change gets included? I would hate it to have another
one of those situations where things break for absolutely no good reason.
Cheers,
- Andreas
Bill Schwab wrote:
> Gang,
>
> I'm not sure what to make of this. It seems that I'm probably missing
> something, but here is my attempt at "asking the community" including
>
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2002-October/045216.html
>
> I doubt it will seriously complicate the ultimate fix, and corrects one
> removeable singularity while we wait. Do you want to include it?
>
> Bill
>
>
> I suggest you to ask what the community wants and we will include if
> this is ok.
>
> Stef
>
>
>>With tongue only partly in cheek, how about this one:
>>
>>http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2002-October/
>>045216.html
>>
>>I will admit that removing the entanglement of _ with assignment is
>>preferable, but having the ability to include _ anywhere but the first
>>character of a selector is a huge down payment. Why is this not in
>>the
>>mainstream image? It would be huge help to those of us with RDB
>>centric
>>uses for _ in selectors.
>
>
> Wilhelm K. Schwab, Ph.D.
> University of Florida
> Department of Anesthesiology
> PO Box 100254
> Gainesville, FL 32610-0254
>
> Email: bills at anest4.anest.ufl.edu
> Tel: (352) 846-1285
> FAX: (352) 392-7029
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|