On 11/22/05, Bert Freudenberg <bert at impara.de> wrote:
> Until now, in the spirit of TSSTCPW, MCConfigurations are a flat list
> of versions (MCVersionDependencies, to be precise).
>
I've seen that. But, theoretically, because the interface of an MCM
and an MCZ w.r.t. loading seems to be the same, it should be possible
to put a pointer to an MCM in a configuration, no?

> You would have to have two separate config maps, one with all four
> packages, and one with only the two basic ones.
>
Yup. Lots of duplication, that's why it isn't TSSTCPW anymore and I'm
sniffing out how to embrace-and-extend MCC :)