Yes, I think this is what we agreed.

Dave

p.s. Thanks Alex.

On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 09:55:04PM +0200, stéphane ducasse wrote:
> This one
> CheckInitialDelayTime-854-v4-laza.2.cs [^] (3,766 bytes) 02-12-05 12:52
> ?
> 
> Stef
> 
> 
> On 1 oct. 05, at 21:22, Alexander Lazarević wrote:
> 
> > Actually I don't have to add more to the subject than I have said  
> > in my
> > last but one comment on the bug, which is in short: Leave Class  
> > Delay as
> > it is, only protect the primitive against bad parameters. And that's
> > what my changeset does.
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > stéphane ducasse schrieb:
> >
> >> hi all
> >>
> >> I need feedback on http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=854
> >> can the people involved in the discussion let me know what is the cs
> >> that should be considered at the end?
> >>
> >> Tim, alexander, david, lex....
> >>
> >> Stef