Mailman vs ezmlm
Daniel Vainsencher
daniel.vainsencher at gmail.com
Fri Oct 7 03:33:00 UTC 2005
Whichever one it is that is running the packages list, I couldn't find
where to tell it to register an address and not send anything to it. I
happen to switch SMTP servers often.
As a result, I get three of everything. So whichever that mailing list
manager that is, I'm not happy with it.
Daniel
Simon Michael wrote:
> Hi Cees.. good question. I also run both. I think they're both about
> equally capable, but differ in their manageability.
>
> ezmlm is great for lists you set up and then forget about; they just
> work, no intervention required. It doesn't come with any decent web
> interface that I know of, though there may be one out there. (I've seen
> the one at discuss.squeakfoundation.org.)
>
> Mailman of course has a rather good and complete web interface for both
> admins and subscribers. Many knobs and options to twiddle to get things
> just right, but it's easier to come back to it a month or a year later
> and figure out how to do something.
>
> From a user point of view, unless there's a better ezmlm web interface
> available I guess I'd vote for mailman everywhere.
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|