Need to do something

stéphane ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Oct 18 20:56:03 UTC 2005


On 18 oct. 05, at 00:05, Andreas Raab wrote:

> Actually, this is a pretty accurate summary as far as I am  
> concerned, so thanks for making it. The only question remaining is:  
> What do we do about it? After all the starting point here was that  
> we need to do something (see subject line) so after establishing a  
> few ground rules we still need to take some action, right?

Yes please propose something that we can start building on top.
I would love to be able to contribute more actively in terms of code  
cleaning or packaging but the harvesting to fixes should be done.

Stef


> Cheers,
>   - Andreas
>
> goran at krampe.se wrote:
>
>> Hi people!
>> Phew. Double phew. Ehm, can someone that has read all this please
>> summarize and exclude all the finer points about what happened/and  
>> what
>> did not happen with Chess etc? I would like to see where this all  
>> ended
>> up. If you did get to a conclusion that is. :)
>> My short sweet take on this is:
>> - Yes, we need package maintainer teams. Ownership is important  
>> (we are
>> not talking licenses here) and I will not go into the arguments.
>> - Yes, the Release Team (which is the more proper term IMHO  
>> instead of
>> "Harvesters") should mainly do *integration* and if they do "patch"
>> things those patches should be fed upstream (=back to package
>> maintainers).
>> - Yes, a package maintainer team has a team leader just as any team.
>> Ok, meeting in 10 minutes, gotta run.
>> regards, Göran
>>
>
>
>




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list