KomHttp v. Swazoo server

Jimmie Houchin jhouchin at cableone.net
Wed Oct 19 16:09:00 UTC 2005


KomHttp seems to be the default http server for Squeak.

It seems that is fairly due to historical reasons.

Are there technical reasons for choosing KomHttp over Swazoo?
If I remember correctly Kom is http 1.0 and Swazoo is http 1.1, yes?

Is it likely that KomHttp will remain the default?

Are they both pretty stable?

The SM page at 
http://map1.squeakfoundation.org/sm/package/0fdb5ffc-cfa1-4d40-96c2-fe325bc8ba5f
for KomHttp says alpha.

http://map1.squeakfoundation.org/sm/package/0a5ade31-262b-4d8e-986c-53d1aa254e19
for Swazoo says beta.

Just looking for opinions (gentle please :) and education.

Jimmie



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list