Personally I think that it'll work much quicker if teams do this work
for themselves, and fix it immediately. After all, that's why I pop up
all these method browsers so you can go through them and fix it.

Of course, if you'd whip something up that would make a hall of shame
on the Wiki.... Like for every package the statistics. That'd be fun
and might kick some people into action :)

As far as versions are concerned: personally I'm going to concentrate
cleanup actions on 3.9a only. As Files maintainer I'll backport
serious issues to 3.8 and submit them for the update stream, but
that's mostly all I'll be doing to 3.8...

On 10/21/05, Lic. Edgar J. De Cleene <edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
> Cees De Groot puso en su mail :
>
> > But QC was mostly meant with base packages in mind. I don't think base
> > packages should send halt or mess up the Transcript. We've got
> > exceptions to deal with communicating exceptional stuff to the outside
> > world
> Yes. Is very clear.
> Going back to first post, what you think of test all packages for 3.7, 3.8
> and 3.9 and doing a swiki page about this ?
> See about package dependencies ?
> I could do the boring job and you review / correct .
>
> Edgar
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> 1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam
> Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo
> http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
>
>
>