Il giorno mer, 07/09/2005 alle 09.34 -0700, Tom Phoenix ha scritto:

> Thanks; between this and other postings, I've been able to get started
> with Monticello. And now I'm enlightened on the leading asterisks in
> so many category names.
> 
> In the change set that I'm trying to publish, in addition to new
> classes and new methods in existing classes, I've made a number of
> changes to minor methods of various unrelated classes. I am moving
> each of the changed methods to category "*MyClassName", which gets
> Monticello to notice them. But I feel that this can't be the right
> thing to do with existing methods, since the original category names
> are being lost. Am I on the wrong track here?

You can specify a subcategory, ie '*MyClassName-accessing' etc.

	Giovanni