Ok goran.
I will have to sit and check what's happens because I could trace it  
back and not way
to understand why I ended in this situation. So sorry for the mess,  
but the metaphor
apparently was not working for me and I have no tools to build  
hypothesis except
seen the methods removed.

Stef

> Hi!
>
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?st=E9phane_ducasse?= <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
>
>> But I think that the fixes of goran does not pay attention to the
>> callers of the removed functionality.
>> If you remove a method, and do not deprecate it, then I do not see
>> how callers would not break.
>>
>
> Stef - I did *not* remove that method. Ok? :) Marcus was trying to
> explain that.
> He has moved that method to Network but when I started doing my  
> fixes I
> used the previous Network version in which that method *did not  
> exist*.
>
> So now - when you try to load my version (why don't you instead try to
> use "merge" or something?) the system thinks that *I* removed that
> method.
>
> I should possibly have checked if there was a newer Network version -
> but I don't really know how to do that (I mean, I can see there are
> numerous newer versions of various packages - but how do I know which
> configuration I should use?).
>
> regards, Göran
>
>