agreed, thank you, Daniel

> Note that while that is the correct answer in a way (that's the change 
> set in the image that has that change), it is not what Stef really 
> wanted because it doesn't give him traceability to where that change 
> got in.
>
> Its interesting that that code got into the wrong changeset. I don't 
> know if that's a big deal, or we should just get used to using the MC 
> related tools for this kind of thing.
>
> Daniel
>
> danil osipchuk wrote:
>
>> Seems to be in Collections-md.20 (method versions browser -> menu 
>> "find original cs")
>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> which cs?
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>